Model Factory in the age of AI

Competing in the Age of AI

AI has become the pillar of growth for companies when it comes to maintaining relevance as well as an edge over the competition. What’s more, AI based models have become the new revenue drivers for companies looking to capitalize on data as a competitive advantage. The rise in algorithmically driven successes can be attributed primarily to enhancements on the hardware side. Big data tools, and an infrastructure based on both on-premise and cloud services, have paved the way for this fully evolved AI ML ecosystem.

According to a study, AI is the next digital frontier and organizations that leverage models have a 7.5% profit margin advantage over their peers. With AI models becoming the key pillar for building valuable IP and revenue, Anteelo shows the way with a new approach to model management.

With more research being plowed into tweaking neural networks, businesses face a bunch of tricky questions-how profitable it is to go full ML? Is the available compute infrastructure sufficient enough to take the leap? Can the deployed model adjust to the changing grounds and business requirements?

From training personnel to acquiring tools, business leaders are also grappling with critical questions related to model management — model validity in the face of changing business realities. Models lose validity over time as market realities change, new contingencies emerge, and new variables come into the picture. Hence all models need to be revamped and refreshed regularly to ensure they remain relevant. However, the refresh process is often manual and possesses a lot of scope for improvement.

Anteelo employs machine learning algorithms to develop analytics solutions for its customers. Our solutions range from providing prediction frameworks for online retailers in the US to cutting costs for manufacturers of thermal insulation materials. We are embracing a factory approach to building AI models.

Need For A Move to a Factory Approach

The Factory of the Future

There are multiple reasons models needs to move to a factory approach. Setting up models for the first time is a highly ad hoc process which is over-dependent on the skill of the data scientist building the model. The process is also highly susceptible to human biases and is very labor intensive. Model refreshes, on the other hand, are reactive and end up following a blind process, and remain labor intensive.

The term ML model refers to the model artefact that is created by the training process. The training data must contain the correct answer, which is known as a target or target attribute.
The learning algorithm finds patterns in the training data that maps the input data attributes to the target (the answer to be predicted), and it outputs an ML model that captures these patterns. A model can have many dependencies and to store all the components to make sure all features available both offline and online for deployment, all the information is stored in a central repository.

The new set up for a model factory approach should start with a strong clarity about the business requirements and environment. When building the model for the first time, the bounds for the model should be clearly defined, and the best model identified. If necessary, an ensemble of multiple models should be used. A good model can be identified basis multiple criteria, such as quality metrics, cumulative gains, heat maps, bootstrapping methods and other techniques.

The model refresh process should go through the following steps:

  • Define frequency of refresh, as well as exception conditions under which an out-of-turn refresh must be done
  • Define when the refresh will occur – is it when the current scenarios repeat, or when new scenarios emerge
  • Automate the refresh process, with clear bounds of the process defined. Data collection, splitting the dataset into training and validation samples, running the models, and validating and analyzing them for accuracy, are all steps than can be automated.

Importance of the AI-human Interface

The ultimate goal of any AI research is to derive insights about the business. Highly accurate AI models are usually harder for a human (especially a non-data scientist) to interpret, so the right model which balances accuracy vs. interpretability should be deployed. Since the eventual value of a model lies in its usage by business teams to meet targets or achieve goals, human review and understanding of models is essential. The model factory is intended to save human time in refreshing models through automation. This human time can in turn be used to analyze and derive the right insights from the mode results.

Future Direction

Traditional data storage and analytic tools can no longer provide the agility and flexibility required to deliver relevant business insights. An AIML based factory model approach augmented within human intelligence can help organizations overcome maintain competitiveness and relevance. Organizations seeking transition to an AIML based model factory setup can get an idea of how to scale by looking at Anteelo’ s approach.

The rationale for MRO change from a business standpoint

4 tips to navigating the changing maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) market - Aerospace Manufacturing and Design

Without sophisticated maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) systems, airlines couldn’t operate as the global enterprises they are today. Yet recent studies of aircraft IT MRO systems have revealed a long list of shortcomings.

For example, older systems lack the ability to minimize the impact of scheduled and unscheduled maintenance. They maintain a dependence on manual workflows and paper-based systems. But the effects from a forward-looking perspective are even more important. Older systems lack the ability to optimize business processes or drive operational improvements from a growing body of data generated by next-generation aircraft now entering service.

Despite the growing list of limitations, existing MRO systems have continued to hang on because they are highly customized and tightly woven into many other operational areas. Replacement isn’t a point-and-click upgrade. And because migration to a new MRO solution can be a multiyear process, many airlines still choose to bear the growing expense of maintaining existing systems.

That no longer needs to be the case. Airlines can break from the cycle of escalating costs and diminishing returns by adopting a new vision for what an MRO system can be and the value it can deliver.

Digitizing and transforming maintenance operations

What is the Value of Digitization, Digitalization & Digital Transformation (DX) in Manufacturing?

Central to this shift is the transition to a connected transportation platform. Airlines want to analyze data to better predict maintenance events, minimize unplanned maintenance, react more swiftly to scheduling changes, increase resource efficiency, and ultimately become more agile. A platform for MRO services enables airlines to accelerate their business transformation.

Airlines that digitize and transform maintenance operations will be positioned for growth. They can gain visibility into the scheduling needs and compliance of maintenance requirements, maximize aircraft maintenance yields, improve agility to adapt to operational business process changes, increase the productivity and job satisfaction of their workforces, and offer a superior experience for passengers by reducing aircraft delays. A next-generation, connected MRO solution can help airlines achieve this by:

  • Improving connectivity across systems, enabling airlines to make agile decisions based on accurate data
  • Shifting equipment maintenance from scheduled or condition-based maintenance to analytics-based predictive maintenance
  • Delivering productivity gains through automation and digitization of manual maintenance processes
  • Optimizing maintenance execution by enabling just-in-time delivery of materials
  • Improving the ability to gain insight into historical maintenance
  • Offering increased flexibility to swiftly adapt to operational and regulatory compliance process changes
  • Empowering technicians and simplifying their work via mobile applications and virtual assistants
  • Reducing the potential for expensive delays through improved visibility of maintenance variables when making scheduling changes

At the scale airlines operate at today, small changes add up to big savings. For example, shaving a half-percent off the number of daily flight delays due to maintenance results in annual cost savings of $4 million to $18 million for 1,000 to 4,000 flights per day. Or, consider this: a 10 percent staff productivity gain could result in annual savings of $15 million to $70 million.

Want to Know How Digital Transformation in Manufacturing is Driving Interconnection Growth? - Interconnections - The Equinix Blog

A connected transportation platform is the key element that airlines require to develop a deeper understanding of their maintenance needs, while providing the foundation for delivering innovative services. A connected transportation platform enables a forward-looking operation to enhance quality and achieve the level of agility, flexibility, and speed needed to transform capabilities such as long-term planning, staff scheduling and task execution.

As airlines look for ways to grow and deliver new value to customers, success hinges on embracing solutions that lead to their desired business outcomes: maximizing the availability and reliability of aircraft while minimizing maintenance costs.

error: Content is protected !!