When you plan to buy a new phone there is always a battle as in which phone to buy. Whether you should go for an Android operated phone or an iPhone is a perennial doubt. However experts are of the opinion that an iPhone seems a better choice when compared with an Android phone.
I like Android phones. But when most friends and family ask me what phone to buy, I tend to recommend the iPhone over Android. Here’s why.
So let us explore some of the reasons as to why iPhone has the capacity to beat an Android operated phone.
The first reason as to why iPhone seems a better choice is that an iPhone is much faster when compared to Android phones. The result is that you can get a lot of features done quite fast. For example, editing 4k videos or opening of large files can be done almost in no time.
If you’re thinking of buying the iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus or iPhone X, know that the A11 Bionic chip inside blows away anything from the Android camp. Not only did this processor pace Apple’s flagship to huge wins in synthetic benchmarks such as Geekbench 4 and 3DMark; it also ran circles around the likes of the Galaxy Note 8 and the Galaxy S8 when doing things like editing 4K video and opening large files.
iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 plus has better camera. Hence, you can take more colorful and vibrant photographs. Especially when the photos are taken in sunlight you can expect better results.
The hardware and software integration in iPhone is a lot better than that of Android operated phones. Consequently you can take quick actions from the home screen by pressing on the app for long.
It is true that Android has made promises to launch phones which are user friendly but it is the iPhone that has won the race. Right from its inception in 2007 the iPhone has retained its simplicity of usage. You will just have to pick it up, turn it on and press on the app to proceed with the functionalities.
The best thing about an iPhone is that there is automatic updation of the OS when compared to the Android phones. You can update the latest version of software on the day it is released.
As far as apps are considered an iPhone has the best of applications. This means if you are someone who has a fetish for apps, undoubtedly the app is the best choice.
iPhone is known for not having unnecessary software unlike a lot of other Android phones. Even if there are certain applications that you do not need you will be able to disable them.
An iPhone works excellently with Mac. You will always have easy access on your Mac to the photos that you take on your iPhone.
iPhone offers an extraordinary feature of family sharing. Purchases from the App store, iTunes, and iBooks can be shared among six people.
When you face any sort of problem with your iPhone there is no reason to worry because you can access numerous articles and blogs on Apple’s website and also live chat and schedule an appointment to solve the problem. In case of Android phones you will have to try to find solutions from various online forums.
When you have a problem with your Android phone, you can try online forums or calling your carrier. But with the iPhone, you can tap into a vast database of useful help articles on Apple’s website, get help via live chat, or you can schedule an appointment at an Apple Store Genius Bar. Google doesn’t have this kind of direct relationship with its customers. With Android, you’re on your own.
The battle of Java vs Python is nothing less than that of these top rivalry. Both the programming languages have gained limelight in the coding world in different aspects. They have different use cases and even fan bases. In fact, they are used as a metaphor to showcase things entirely different/incompatible.
However, there’s one common factor between them: Both have survived and remain on the top in the programming world since 2000. They have outshined in the market despite the bustling hassle due to the advent of new programming languages.
But, how did they make this possible? And can they beat each other in the coding world as well?
Let’s dive into the programming environment and find out in this article.
Before we begin, let’s look through the prism of history and know the history and pros of python and java.
A Basic Introduction to Java Programming Language
Java is a general-purpose, object-oriented programming language developed back in 1995 by James Gosling at Sun Microsystems. The language supports the idea of WORA (Write Once, Run Anywhere) and has a syntax similar to that of C and C++.
It is one of the most popular programming languages in the market with a reported 9 million mobile app developers loving it. A fondness that has been a ripple effect of the benefits it offers to the development environment :-
Pros of Considering Java Programming Language
Java is free, simple, distributed, and object-oriented programming language with support for multithreading programming concept.
It comes with exciting features like try-with-resources, generics, etc., along with automatic garbage collection and seamless memory management models. This makes it a great option for creating highly robust and reliable applications.
Java, since Java SE version 8 (JDK 8), is being updated with functional programming features like Lambda Expressions and Functional interfaces. This enhances the code flexibility, which also counts to the advantages of Java.
Additionally, the language is platform-independent. Meaning, its code can run across different platforms including desktops, mobiles, and embedded systems.
With this covered, let’s take a turn towards Python, before deciding the winner of the Java vs Python war.
A Basic Introduction to Python Programming Language
Python is a dynamically-typed general purpose programming language developed by Guido van Rossum in 1990. The original intent behind its development was to bridge the gap between C and the shell, and simplify the process of creating system administration utilities. But, later its use was expanded to other development areas also.
The language bagged the title of ‘Programming Language Hall of Fame’ for 2018 because of the plethora of advantages it offers, such as:
Benefits of Considering Python Programming Language
One of the prime advantages of Python is that it is open-source and free-to-use.
The Python Package Index (PyPI) has varied third-party modules that eases interaction with other programming languages and platforms, including C, C++, C#, VB, and Perl.
The programming language has a built-in list and dictionary data structures that makes it easier to construct fast runtime data structures.
It offers the functionality of dynamic high-level typing and a wide range of standard libraries related to string operations, operating system interfaces and protocols, web service tools, and more. These reduces the code length and developers’ efforts while working with Python.
Now as we have taken a look into the basics of both Java and Python, it is likely that you are familiar with the similarities and differences between the two languages. So, let’s not wait anymore and turn towards the core part of the article, i.e, Java vs Python comparison.
Factors to Consider When Comparing Python and Java
1. Market Popularity
The foremost factor to consider is the market popularity.
Though Java’s popularity has declined since the advent of Kotlin, the language is still popular in the market. And when it comes to Python, the language is enjoying astronomically higher growth in the development arena.
This gives a clear indication that both the programming languages are the right options to start your career with, in the present scenario.
2. Architecture
In case of Java, Java Virtual Machine (JVM) – a chunk of JRE (Java Run Environment) – provides the runtime environment to operate the code. It converts Java bytecode into machine language which can be directly compiled at the time of execution. This eventually offers a seamless architectural experience to developers.
And when focusing on Python from architecture front, the interpreter translates source code into machine-independent bytecode. It then stores the bytecode file in some folder. When you run the same program, it employs the bytecode without translating it again. These bytecode are then shipping to PVM, where the actual code executes.
3. Ease to Use
Since Python follows a dynamic programming concept, the codes are short, and much easier to use than those written in Java.
Because of this, Python lead the ‘Java vs Python’ battle.
4. Speed and Efficiency
Java comes with a Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler which compiles bytecode into native machine code in real-time, and JVM that calls the compiled code directly. Now, since code need not be interpreted, compiling process does not consume much time and memory. This eventually adds to the speed and efficiency of the development environment.
However, in the case of Python, codes are interpreted based on the variable time, which slows down the pace of compilation during runtime. Also, since the object type of objects is obtained from container objects, higher memory is consumed. This reduces the speed and efficiency of the language.
This makes Python lag behind Java in the ‘Java vs Python’ battle in terms of performance.
5. Code Readability
Python has a linear and less dispersed coding format, when compared to Java. For example, there is no need to put a semicolon at the end of every station. Also, the curly braces are not much practised.
This, as a whole, makes it easier to read and understand Python codes when compared to Java.
6. Practical Agility
When it comes to agile environment, both Java and Python are second to none.
On one side, Java is considered a rigid option due to its undeviating refactoring support and universality of IDEs in development (such as Eclipse, IntelliJ, and NetBeans). Something that makes it an optimal option for embracing web and mobile app technology.
While, on the other side, Python already enjoys a presence in the agile domain and python has been a favorable language for developing apps having IoT, AI, Machine Learning, and more.
7. Database Opportunity
Python’s database access layers are weakly active when compared to Java’s JDBC (Java DataBase Connectivity). Because of this, Java gets the privilege to easily connect with different databases like SQL and SQOOP, which eventually makes it more suitable for Enterprise app development solutions.
8. Development Options
In terms of development, both the programming languages offer ample opportunities. Something, which again make it difficult to find which one has an edge over the other.
Java is chosen as the best programming language for building:-
Desktop GUI apps
Embedded Systems
Web applications, including back-office electronic trading systems, data processing, and e-commerce applications.
Web and Application services
Mobile applications
Middleware products
Enterprise solutions, and more.
Whereas, Python is recommended for developing:-
Image processing and Graphic design apps
Games
Computational applications
Machine Learning apps
Operating Systems
Language development
Web frameworks and Web applications
Prototyping, and more.
9. Community Support
Again, both Java and Python enjoys a wide community support.
Python has a strong community of over 1,637 Python user groups in around 37 countries and191 cities. These user groups organize various events, including PyLadies meetups where women meet and code together.
Whereas, when talking about Java, it also has a large and vibrant community support. There are several Java User Groups (JUGs) across the globe. Also, there are various high-profile events like JavaOne organized by the Java programmers.
10. Job Opportunities and Salaries
Both Java and Python, as revealed by Gooroo, have the potential to offer a profitable
future to developers. Both languages are highly in demand in the marketplace, something that can be understood from the number of monthly jobs advertised related to them.
While this proves the number of job opportunities for Java and Python developers, it’s the best time to have a look at the average salary details for these two skills between 2017 and 2019. Something that will help developers to determine which one of the two offers more salary.
While these Java vs Python comparison factors will give you a glimpse of the two coding world, it won’t be enough to choose between the two languages. They have not-so-significant- similarities and differences that make it difficult to choose one. So, it is better to consult with renowned full stack developers to make a sound decision.
JavaScript frameworks are changing the scenario of the front-end development world. They are proving to have the potential to build cross-platform mobile apps with ease and better future considerations. However, not all the front-end JavaScript frameworks are enjoying the same limelight in the marketplace.
While many new frameworks like Vue and Ember have entered the market and are gaining momentum with their exceptional options, frameworks like jQuery and Aurelia are losing their charm in the JavaScript world. They are struggling with getting the attention of the mobile app developers – a mandate for remaining in the development world.
In such a scenario where JavaScript frameworks are losing the market at a considerably higher pace than they enter into the market, keeping yourself abreast with what are the best JavaScript frameworks in 2019 can act as a helping hand in curating a profitable future in the marketplace. And when talking about the JavaScript frameworks to consider in 2019, looking at the two popular frameworks, Angular and Vue, and seeing how to choose the right option among them can be worthwhile.
Taking the same thought forward, we will have a brief look of both the JavaScript frameworks and look into Vue.js vs Angular comparison in this article.
So, here we begin with the first section, i.e, the brief introduction of Angular and Vue.
A Basic Overview of Angular and Vue.js
Backed by Google, Angular is an open-source framework considered for building dynamic websites and applications. The framework falls under the category of MEAN stack and is supportable with a wide range of code editors. Its latest version is Angular 8, which introduced various exciting features in the development environment, such as differential loading, dynamic import for lazy routes, CLI workflow improvements, support for Node 10, and support for TypeScript 3.4.
Whereas, the answer to what is Vue is that it is an open-source framework created by Evan You for tackling the challenges associated with Angular and React JS frameworks. The framework is highly recognised in the market for developing a simple page web application. Its latest version is Vue 2.6 which has come up with features and update that adds to its popularity in the market, such as the introduction of Slots, Async error handling, template compile warnings with source information, dynamic directive arguments, Explicit creation of standalone reactive objects, and more.
Both these JavaScript application frameworks are loved by various reputed brands for reaping higher profits of the mobile market, including:-
While there can be various reasons behind why these brands have adopted Vue.js 2.6 vs Angular 8, a few of them are stated below:-
Benefits of Considering Angular Development Framework
Some of the pros of Angular that proves it to be the right JS framework for your app needs are:-
Server-Side Rendering
Angular JS framework offers better Server-Side Rendering (SSR) features that improve the page speed on the client side. This makes the JS framework more SEO-friendly.
Separation of Concerns
Angular follows the MVC model, which makes it good for separation of concerns and cleaner faster development.
Deep Linking Module
The framework provides developers with an extensive linking module for single page app development that assists in understanding of how Ajax works and introducing its advantages into your app project.
Tools and Filters
As stated earlier, Angular 8 comes up with various features, tools, and filters that makes development environment better and faster. Some of these features are lazy loading, virtual scrolling, preview of Ivy, support for Node 10, and more.
Testing and Maintenance
The Angular IO framework comes with advanced refactoring and debugging options that aid developers in the testing and maintenance process. Besides, it renders the opportunity to test the complete project with a single testing tool like Jasmine, Karma and Protractor. This cut down the hassle of developers and ensure highly-effective results.
Update Scope with CLI
As we have already seen in our article React vs Angular covered a few months ago, Angular CLI is easy to install and use. It also serves mobility experts with simpler commands and effective testing tools and is supported by several engineers and platforms that make it possible to update all the app components – including those having dependency on third-party libraries and APIs.
While these are the advantages of Angular that supports the idea of choosing it for front-end development, it’s good to have a glance at the benefits of Vue to determine what to consider in Vue.js vs Angular to do justice to your app needs.
Advantages of Going with Vue.js
Vue.js is emerging out as one of the most popular front-end JavaScript frameworks to rely upon for your application development needs, with benefits like:-
Memory Consumption
One of the pros of Vue.js development is that the app developed can be as light as 18Kb after zipping. This makes it the first choice to target the user base demanding for low memory consumption with impressive features availability.
Ease of Learning
Vue CLI comes under the category of most popular JavaScript frameworks in 2019. Its CLI is too basic when compared to other frameworks including Angular. Besides, it has an extensive and updated documentation. All these reasons make it the first choice of all those who are or wish to enter the development arena.
Readability
Being written in JavaScript and having the property of clean codes, this framework makes it easier for anyone to read and understand the code to take the app development process further.
Download Speed
Since the app size is minimal, the Vue.js – based application is faster to download and employ.
Integration Scope
As specified earlier in our Vue.js vs Reactjs article that was covered last year, Vue.js facilitates a simpler and easier integration process. This makes it developers’ favorite to build both single page application from scratch and integrate high-end components into an existing one.
Server-Side Rendering
Another factor that counts under the benefits of Vue.js is that it also offers option of Server-side rendering. This improves the speed of the working of pages on the client end, which eventually result in better user experience.
Now as we have grasped the basics of both, let’s jump directly into the JavaScript frameworks comparison part so that you could select the optimal framework for your business needs. In short, let’s take a turn towards Vue.js vs Angular.
Vue.js vs Angular: Factors to Determine the Right Development Option
1. Popularity
As per the 2018 State of JavaScript survey, the percentage of people who have never heard of Vue has reduced from 5% to 1% in just a year. This signifies that Vue.js popularity is growing.
But as disclosed by GitHub, while Vue is getting higher stars and forks, it is lagging behind in terms of the number of commits and contributors. This makes it tough to say which framework is better in terms of popularity – Vue.js vs Angular – Angular vs Vue.js.
2. Learning Curve
To develop an application with Angular frontend development framework, you need to get expertise at concepts like TypeScript and MVC. But, this is not in the case of Vue.
Vue.js framework offers inbuilt app templates and higher customization which makes it easier than Angular and React. Besides, Vue.js – being designed by blending Angular and React – makes it easier to bring Angular or React-based mobility solution on Vue platform.
3. Architecture
Another factor that influences the decision in JS framework comparison is architecture. While Angular implements MVC (Model-View-Controller) and MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel) for creating dynamic websites and web applications, Vue primarily focuses only on the ViewModel and shows limited data. This makes Vue.js become inferior to Angular in the development world.
This makes Angular win the title of Angular vs Vue.js battle.
4. Complexity
Since Vue.js has been developed much later than various other JS frameworks including React and Angular JS (the earlier version of Angular), it is much simpler than Angular in terms of design and API.
In other words, Angular comes with a much higher complexity than Vue.js in the development arena.
5. Scalability
When you look at scalability as the deciding factor in Angular vs Vue, the former leads the competition. This is because Angular has a proper modular development structure while Vue.js employs template-based syntax, which reduces the reusability of code in large-size apps.
6. TypeScript Support
Angular is highly integrated with TypeScript – the upgraded version of JavaScript. It is not possible to code in Angular ecosystem without Typescript. Whereas, when talking about Vue.js, JavaScript is considered for writing codes. But, it also provides Vue.js developers with official typings and official decorator to easily collaborate TypeScript features into Vue development environment.
7. App Size and Loading Time
Though the recent Angular versions have traits like AOT compilation and tree-shaking which reduces the app size to a considerable rate, an Angular-based app is still not as lighter as the one developed using Vue framework. And since loading time depends heavily on app size, Vue.js mobile app ensures faster loading.
Thus, the winner of Vue.js vs Angular battle is the former.
8. Flexibility
The next factor that holds the key to choosing the best JS frameworks between Vue.js and Angular is flexibility.
Vue.js, when compared to Angular, is less opinionated and provides developers with an official support for a wide range of build systems with no constraint upon the app structure. This indicates that Vue.js is a better option over Angular in terms of freedom and flexibility.
9. App Performance
In web and mobile app development, the performance level is directly associated with DOM (Document Object Model). While Angular uses real DOM in which the complete web/app page is rendered even on changing a single component, Vue.js works with Virtual DOM in which changes are reflected on the real DOM only on those components that are modified. This approach accelerates the app performance, making Vue.js a winner over Angular in the front-end JavaScript frameworks market.
10. Data Binding
Just like React, Vue.js also relies upon the concept of one-way data binding in which the UI elements cannot be altered before changing the model state. Whereas, Angular employs two-way binding approach in which model state changes when UI element is changed and vice-versa.
While two-way binding seems an easier method, it lags behind Vue.js’s one-way data binding approach in terms of making faster data flow and creating non-trivial apps in less time.
11. Ease of Deployment
Earlier it was required to focus on writing a “good” Angular application to reap the perks of lazy loading, Ahead-of-Time compilation (AoT), module system and other related features. But, the Angular 8 version has come up with changes that revolutionized the whole scenario. The Angular update introduced options like differential loading, CLI workflow improvements, dynamic import for lazy routes, and more which added ease to the deployment process.
Whereas, in the case of Vue.js, you can either import anything into your app environment or build a complex local setup (created using Vue CLI) which regulates the code optimizations. You can employ lazy loading of components and even pre-compile the templates already available on Vue.js.
12. Testing
When taking testing as the prime factor, Angular is a better choice over Vue.js. It has a great testing mechanism and offers multiple tools like Jasmine and Karma that test the complete development code individually. Whereas, Vue.js lacks the right testing guidelines making it tough for developers to deliver a bug-free application.
13. Mobility Solutions
Angular is a web-based app framework considered for creating real-time apps like instant messaging or chat applications. Whereas, Vue.js is suitable for designing lightweight single page web applications with an easy interface.
14. Community Support
Vue.js, unlike Angular which is backed by Google, is driven wholly by an open-source community. Because of this, it lags behind Angular and other JS frameworks in terms of the number of commits and contributors despite having a higher number of watchers, stars and forks on GitHub. Besides, the migration helper tool of Vue.js is not effective for large-scale application due to the absence of a roadmap that concentrates upon versioning and their plans. All these factors indicate that Angular is a winner over Vue.js in terms of community support.
Though the aforementioned factors will help in deciding the right option and leverage maximum advantages, it’s good to look into which JS framework is best for which situation – Vue.js vs Angular.
When to Consider Angular for Your App Project
You are developing a large, dynamic and complex app project.
You want a real-time application like Instant messaging and Chat app.
You require easy and reliable scalability.
You have time to learn TypeScript before the project begins.
You are fond of Object-oriented programming.
When to Pick Vue.js for App Development
You are developing a lightweight and single-page app.
With this, we have now reached the end of this article. We have looked into the factors that can help in deciding the right JavaScript framework among Vue.js vs Angular for your application development needs and the situations you can relate to. But, if you still can’t decide what to choose for your app needs and how to proceed further, consult with our app development experts.
Our team, with their years of experience in app development for different business verticals and needs, will guide you in considering the right factors and thus, launching a profitable mobility solution in the market.
Mobile apps have to be built from scratch whereas mobile web are an adaptation of the website version. There is no denying that both the ways of mobility is great but there are some extraordinary factors that differentiate one from another.
If we stop and look around we will notice that the world is turning into a giant mobile strategy stopping at nothing. Every business, every corporation and every institution has come to use mobile in some way or the other for its functioning.
Earlier, the debates used to be between offline and online media but now the case is different. These debates have turned into one online media vs the other online media. For mobiles, there are two strong terms: mobile apps and mobile web. This app vs website discussion has not settled yet and the question of ‘Is it better to use an app or the website?’ always looms.
Many say that it’s better to have a mobile web than a mobile app but then there are advantages of the mole app over a website that proves them wrong. And, the same can be said of mobile websites.
In the end, the most important factor that decides is it better to use an or the website is the purpose. The aim with which the development is done is how the decision should be made.
With statistics hinting at the fact that by 2019 mobile users will grow to 5.07 billion, both website and mobile app seem to be a great option as both are mobile-driven. In a case like that, the only thing that will help make the choice is an understanding of both the elements.
How Are Mobile Apps Different From Mobile Websites?
It is often misunderstood that the mobile website and mobile app is the same. Since both are used on one media, i.e. mobile or smartphone, it does not mean both are same. There are differences between a mobile web and a mobile app which helps in deciding which option would be better for any web and mobile app development company. Developers must know which option to choose for which project to achieve the desired result.
Coming back to the difference between a mobile website and mobile app, let us look at the following points.
A mobile website does not need any separate downloading from the app store. It is simply the mobile view of the website version which is accessible from any mobile device. Whereas mobile apps need to be downloaded from the app store and are developed by mobile app development companies.
Mobile app vs mobile website has another difference of user convenience. In a mobile website, the original website content is composed within the screen of the device whereas mobile apps are built to provide a far better version of the website.
The chances of regular visits are higher on mobile apps than on mobile websites. As mobile apps are stored in the smart devices it can be reopened and used whenever one wishes to. However, mobile websites are used to announce events or programmes to a larger audience.
Because of difference in websites vs app development process, the updating process becomes different on app vs website. Websites update automatically whereas app users have to download and install an update of the app. Sometimes users delay the update of the apps which is not possible on mobile websites.
The data storage location differs in a mobile app vs mobile website. All the data stored in the mobile app is stored on the mobile device itself. And in the case of websites, the data is stored on the website servers.
The app vs website security is another major concern for users as well as developers. It is seen that mobile apps are more secure than mobile websites and are protected by various security tools. Mobile app development vs web development involves a different approach to security which in the end affects the overall mobile security.
Pros and Cons of Mobile Apps vs Mobile Websites from a Startup Viewpoint
The app vs website debate has some valid points and each has its own pros and cons which we will discuss in this section. The benefits of a mobile website vs an app are enough to determine which must be chosen.
Pros of Mobile Websites
Compatibility Mobile websites give more compatibility to users. The reason being mobile websites improve the user experience across multiple devices. Whereas mobile apps have to be built separately for different devices which affects the overall user experience.
Reach Websites have more reach than mobile apps because of its multi-device support feature. Reaching a large audience does not require much effort in case of mobile websites. When it comes to reaching the potential audience, mobile websites take the win.
Maintainanceandsupport Mobile websites don’t need the regular download-install-update process which mobile apps follow. It is easy to implement the update without users having to download it separately. Once all the updates are active, it is visible on all devices.
Cons of Mobile Website
Convenience Mobile websites don’t match the convenience level of mobile apps. Mobile websites cannot use features that a smart device offers. Features such as camera, GPS, calling, etc. may not work with most of the mobile websites which add to the inefficiency to convenience.
Userexperience Fitting one giant website page within a small device screen seems to be impossible. And even if it is made possible, it will affect the UI of the website. Mobile apps provide a far better user experience by allowing personalization and interaction.
OfflineaccessibilityWebsites cannot be accessed offline and do need a network connection. This is not a problem until a user is unable to find the network and needs to access the website. Mobile apps have the option to be used offline without any problems.
Pros of Mobile Apps
Convenience Mobile apps have been ruling the world for a decade now and focus on user experience. By providing fast loading time, high-end performance and ease of use, apps have become a part of human life. Apps are revolutionizing the entertainment world, the healthcare sector, the political sector, etc.
Personalization Personalization is one of the best advantages of a mobile app over the website. Mobile applications are built in such a manner that users can make changes in the way they want to use the app. Apps allow setting preferences, saving useful information and even sharing media on social networks. All these features enhance the overall user experience.
Offline and online Mobile apps can be used offline without any issues. Since the apps are not an adaptation but rather a completely new product developed by app developers, it can work offline. This means that mobile apps can be used in places where there are no networks and gives apps an upper hand in the app vs website security. AI technology is also being implemented in mobile apps for a better future.
Cons of Mobile Apps
Maintenance and support Regular update and bug fixes are required in the mobile app or a mobile website. In the case of mobile apps, a new update has to be downloaded and installed which is the extra task for users. In mobile websites, updates are automatically implemented without requiring any action from users.
Compatibility As we know mobile apps are built from scratch which makes the whole mobile app development a huge process. But even after the efforts, some devices may not support the mobile app due to a different version or different platform.
Mobile App vs Website: Stats That Speak in Support of Both
The mobile app vs mobile website statistics shows that the app industry may be worth $190 billion by the year 2020.
In the above pie chart, it is seen that maximum users like to use a mobile website or application at different times as per the need.
The USA mobile users spend most of their time on mobile apps than on mobile websites on a daily basis. This app vs website usage shows the preference for mobile apps among US citizens in the app vs website debate.
These stats show some famous social media networks that have become mobile-first. Ever since these turned into apps, the engagement has risen two times more than it used to be.
Another mobile app vs mobile website statistics shows that website’s reach a larger audience as compared to mobile apps. However, mobile apps have 2X more usage time than mobile websites.
When To Use Which: Mobile Apps Vs Mobile Websites
The battle of mobile app vs mobile website has another interesting aspect: when to use which? This question can have many answers based on what you are trying to achieve. For a startup, gaining customers is more important so a website will be the way to go. However, this cannot be said for a startup looking for more engagement.
Here are some pointers that will help you find the best choice based on your need.
Want To Reach More Users?
When it comes to reaching more users then websites are always the better choice. Analysing the Google search traffic data, around 21% of the total traffic comes from mobile devices whereas the rest comes from a desktop. It was also seen that iOS apps have more reach than Android apps in 21% of mobile users traffic. So, for reaching a larger audience whether you are a business or a startup, websites would be the right choice.
Have App Visits that are More than 5 times A Day?
If your app has the ability to get multiple user visits in a day then you should definitely go for a mobile app. To maintain regular visits, the app must be fast and high performing. If you want users to ditch the website then make sure the apps have more to give.
Need to Use Device Features?
Features like GPS, Camera or Calling cannot be used in a web app. A dedicated mobile app will give a totally different experience when it comes to using such features. However, you can access these features on a web app with the help of HTML5, NodeJS, Geolocation API, etc. But then again the question lies about the user experience. To be honest, both the options are good for using features like these if the user experience does not matter much.
Need Fast Operational Speed?
Mobile apps are no doubt faster than web apps because of local storage of data. Unlike web apps, mobile apps don’t need to transfer data to the server or download data from the server which makes the app a faster experience. So when speed is the concern, mobile apps are the favourite choice.
Want to Work in an Offline Mode?
Sometimes network is not available in certain places and that’s when offline mode comes into the picture. The mobile app, hands down, wins in this argument. A mobile app can be built in such a way that it can be used offline or be able to download data for offline usage.
Can You Spend $10K+ on Your Project?
If the answer to this question is no then you might want to go for web apps. Mobile app development costs can range between $10K- $100K for Android and iOS which is a lot, especially for a startup. Also, the prices differ depending on the demography, type of app and other factors. It may cost you $10K for a simple app but a cheap app is not worth it. So, if you can’t spend a ton of money then a web app is your wisest choice.
Will You Update Your Offering Very Often?
If so, then go for web apps first and later you can go for a hybrid app. A hybrid app makes launching updates easier since the users will not have to go and update the app. Apps like Twitter, Instagram, Gmail, etc are all well performing hybrid apps. The benefits of going for hybrid apps are there is no waiting time, one platform needed to build more features and real-time updates.
For a Startup, Is it better to Use a Mobile App or Website?
When it comes to deciding one between mobile app vs website, there are some things to consider first.
Mobile web app vs mobile website has always been debatable especially for those who have wanted one developed for their business. We clearly saw the advantages of the mobile app over the website and found more pros than cons. So for a fair play, we can say that mobile apps are a better choice between the two.
If a startup wishes to reach a larger audience in a short time and less cost then mobile websites are the better choice. To gather a large audience and reach a wider population, websites are great.
However, if you want more engagement then mobile apps are the choice. As the stats for apps vs website usage show, mobile apps have increased the engagement among the users. If you are going for native app development then you get benefits like app security, better UI, high performing app, more engagement, etc.
The solution is not the choice between mobile app development vs web development. It is rather choosing the one that will be most effective for your business model. The right solution must be able to fulfill all the needs and execute the business strategies that have been pre-planned.
In addition to mobile apps and websites, businesses also have an option to go for PWA development. PWA stands for Progressive Web Apps which load just like web pages but have more features to offer. With PWAs, you can work offline, enable push notifications, and use any other feature that a mobile app offers. It is basically a web page that appears as a native application to the users. It is also claimed that PWAs are the future of the app development world.
If you wish to build a mobile app or a mobile website, contact us at Anteelo. We have a team of mobile app developers ready to turn your app ideas into reality.
Apps are more than just technology. Apps have become a part of life and people are spending the majority of their days on apps now. Not to confuse these apps with game apps since non-gaming apps have seen a sudden rise in the market. Next year, 2020, the non-gaming apps are said to reach the global download rate of 284 billion.
Now tell us, can your business afford to lose such a huge market? Absolutely not! Going mobile has so many advantages and opens up multiple doors of opportunities for businesses. Apps are great for creating awareness and providing more value to your customers. This is why most businesses are opting for a mobile app solution.
Those who are going for app development for business must be knowing that there are many choices and decisions to make. During the entire app development process, there are a lot of choices that the app owner and the app developer make in order to get the best possible outcome.
One of these decisions is a choice between native and hybrid apps. The debate of native vs hybrid app has been going on for a while and honestly, there is no black and white answer to it.
So, let us start by understanding what is native app and hybrid app in simple terms.
Defining Native and Hybrid Apps
Native apps are particularly built for one platform. These apps are based on programming languages that support one platform at a time. The languages are Java or Kotlin for Android app development and Swift or Objective-C for iOS app development. These apps cannot be run on other platforms since they are developed for a specific platform. For instance, an app built for iOS platform cannot run on the Android devices and vice versa. However, this does have a benefit. Since the apps are built for one specific platform i.e. iOS or Android or Windows, the apps can use the full functionality of the devices. This means a smooth running app with lesser errors.
What is hybrid app? A hybrid mobile app is based on the web view which runs on a web application in a native browser. These are viewed in UIWebView for iOS and WebView in Android. These apps are developed using languages like CSS, HTML, JavaScript and then Cordova is used for wrapping them into native apps.
When compared, Native vs hybrid app, one is rich in performance and the other has a higher reach in the market. Despite the differences, both types of apps use languages that are considered to be the top programming languages in 2019. These apps have benefits as well as limitations which we will discuss in the upcoming segment of the blog.
Hybrid vs Native Apps Pros and Cons
Now that you are clear with what are native apps and hybrid apps, let’s see their pros and cons. Both the apps are good for different reasons but not for the same reasons. Each has its own pros and cons which will determine whether you should go for a hybrid
mobile app or a native mobile app.
Pros of Native apps
Native apps are fast and smooth since they are developed for one platform.
These apps have the best performance.
In terms of user input and output, the apps run much smoother.
Offline mode is available for most of the apps.
Access to the full functionality of the app devices.
The overall user experience is great as the UI is specific for the platforms.
Cons of Native apps
The cost of native mobile app development is high.
App development time is slow.
You will need expert development agencies since the programming languages are complicated.
This is not a good choice for simple apps.
Pros of Hybrid apps
A hybrid mobile app is developed in less time.
The cost of development is lower for Hybrid apps.
A Hybrid application can run on multiple platforms.
The app development for multiple platforms needs to be done only once.
The maintenance and support for these apps are easy.
Cons of Hybrid apps
Hybrid app development is a much slower process than native app development.
Hybrid apps cannot use the full functionality of mobile devices.
The web apps fail to be interactive and intuitive which is why native apps are better than hybrid in providing good user experience.
Need network at all times to run well.
Hybrid apps depend on a third-party wrapper.
So these were the native vs hybrid apps pros and cons. We can clearly see that both have a reasonable number of pros and cons. Web apps or hybrid apps lack high performance whereas native apps require constant updates from the users’ side. For proper comparison, we shall move to the next segment which is the difference between native and hybrid mobile apps.
What is the Difference Between Native App and Hybrid App?
The native vs hybrid app comparison is done for different criteria. Some differences between mobile native vs hybrid are quite clear as they can be noticed easily. However, there are also some major differences that take place during the app development process.
The first difference is the one that we have been talking about since the beginning of this blog. The native apps are built for one platform whereas the hybrid apps can be run on multiple platforms.
This brings us to the second difference between hybrid app and native app. The programming language used in both apps is different since there is a difference in supporting the platform. Hybrid apps are developed using CSS, HTML and JavaScript whereas Native apps are built using Java for Android and Swift for iOS.
The third difference between native app and hybrid app is the developer. When going for native app development then there is a need of an expert app developer. Since the app is focused on one platform, the importance of UI/UX design in the app is very high. Customers tend to leave the app if they are not satisfied with the UI of the app. On the other hand, hybrid apps are easy to build and takes less time. They do not require an expert for the development process.
In the native vs hybrid app, performance is a major difference. Native apps are smooth and provide better user experience than hybrid apps. For a better understanding of these differences, here is a table of comparison between native vs hybrid app.
One of the differences is the app development cost. Native vs hybrid app development cost differs. The hybrid app development cost ranges from low to medium whereas the native apps range from medium to high.
All these differences help a business decide whether they can use the advantages of a native app or a hybrid app. However, we cannot ignore the fact that both the app development choices have seen some successful apps. Some of the successful Native apps are Twitter, PayPal, LinkedIn, Google Maps, Telegram, PokemonGo, etc. Instagram, Yelp, Baskin Robbin, Basecamp, etc, are examples of Hybrid apps.
If even after this long comparison you haven’t figured out a side in native app vs hybrid app, then the next segment is for you.
Native vs Hybrid App Development: When to Choose Which?
After seeing the pros and cons of native and hybrid mobile applications and the difference between native and hybrid app, we can say each has a set of benefit that the other can’t replace. The hybrid app performance when compared to a native app is poor and lacks interaction. This is a strong point for anyone thinking of owning an app.
Before deciding between native app vs hybrid app, there are some factors that must be considered:
Let us see point by point when to choose which option between native vs hybrid mobile app development.
Choose Native apps:
If you want an app that works online as well as offline.
When you want an app that is interactive and high performing.
If you can accept some low responsiveness in your app.
If your app needs to choose from a wide range of functionalities.
If your app needs to access the mobile devices’ features.
Choose Hybrid apps:
If you have an existing website and want an app for it.
If the app constantly needs to download information from the internet.
If you want to get an app in a short period of time at a less cost.
If the app is simple and does not have complicated calculations or designs.
If you are still testing your ideas in the market.
If the app should be able to use any hardware the device offers.
To conclude with, native apps are built with strong features and technical advancements whereas hybrid apps are cost-effective and less time-consuming. If you wish to know more about native and hybrid app difference or how to build hybrid apps or native apps, contact our app development team at Anteelo.
Starting a mobile app centered business is tough. There are so many questions and doubts that you, in your role as an entrepreneur, have to answer and find answers to. Although things do get a lot easier once you get the support of a partner-like sound mobile app development company, there are a number of factors that you still have to get a grasp on your end for android vs iOS.
While we have curated a mobile app development for startups guide to help you get started with the complete A to Z process of getting your idea on mobile, in this article, we will help you get an answer to the question that worries every entrepreneur who is new to the app industry – android vs iOS for startups.
But before we get on to that, let us give you some ideas and tips on mobile platforms that startups should choose in 2021.
Let’s begin with why one should opt for mobile by joining either Android development or iOS development.
Let’s start looking at the smartphone (iPhone or Android) and app market scenario by first looking into the basics of each – number of users, downloads, revenue, and user retention scenario.
Graphs indicating each of the pointers will help give a clear idea of how both the app stores are performing on an individual level – something which will help businesses take a sound decision.
iPhone or Android? Smartphone Users Graph
These numbers are a clear indication of how big the smartphone industry has been and how it is only going to grow both android and iOS in demand and acquisition number in the coming time. With the number of projected mobile users about to reach 5.7 Billion in a matter of two years, it is beyond time for startups to make a decision related to iOS versus Android and a presence on mobile and reach these billions and then some more users.
Android vs iOS: Market Share
The android and iOS market share division factor when making a choice of iOS vs Android for startup is calculated in terms of total number of users on both platforms. While the graph above shows the obvious – Android development has a greater market share than iOS development, let us still throw some light on it. With the number of Android devices being 10X more than Apple flagship devices, the number of users are by default inclined towards Android as compared to iOS app development.
This difference in market share makes Android a preferable choice for Startups that are keeping visibility above any other business-y factor.
iOS vs Android App Revenue
One of the biggest deciding factors when it comes to Android vs iOS for businesses is the revenue that each of the avenues is able to generate for the startup. As a startup that is about to make an entry in the mobile domain for the first time, it is almost a necessity to base the platform choice on the basis of the potential of revenue they would be able to generate.
While iOS has over time positioned itself as the platform that businesses head to generate revenue, Android developers are soon catching up with their monetized app. But overall, Play Store will still take up more time to come up to App Store level.
Android vs iOS: User Retention
For an entrepreneur struggling to find the answer to which one is correct in iOS vs Android for startup, it is very important to maintain a good user retention number; as it will be the only sign to judge whether or not your app is performing good and is liked by users across the world.
There are a number of factors which contribute to soaring app uninstall rate. Reasons which mostly revolve around the kind of experience you are able to offer through your mobile app.
But in spite of what reasons there are behind growing app uninstall rates in the industry, the fact that users behave differently between one platform to another remains. While Android users are more loyal, Apple users are less forgiving and tend to leave app very soon after a bad experience – something startups need to plan in their incredible & result-driven mobile app design and development in much detail.
Now that we have looked into the market scenario of both the platforms, it is time to attend to the question that every startup willing to make a presence on mobile is seeking answer to – Android vs iOS development for startups.
Android vs iOS: Which Platform Should Startups Go with as Their First App Choice?
The answer to which platform should startups choose out of Android and iOS development is in no way a Yes or No type (and yet, the wrong answer can turn out to be one of the most deadly mobile app development mistakes). There are a number of factors that startups will have to consider when making the choice.
Let us see what those factors are which help decide the platform startups should go with for their first mobile app launch – iPhone or Android.
Where is your audience
Even though 80% of the world’s mobile app market is dominated by Android, some of the most presumed revenue generating nations like the USA or Australia come under Apple’s dominance. So if your audience belongs to the western nations, take help from iPhone app developers but if the world is your audience, go with Android developers.
Who is your user
The choice of app platform goes beyond geographical borders. There are a number of traits that separates iOS vs Android demographics.
iOS users usually have a lot higher income, come with greater education levels, are more engaged with the app, and lastly are willing to spend a lot more on the app.
Android users on the other hand, come with their own share of characteristic traits. They usually belong to the 25 to 45 age range, are more spending conscious, tend to be late technology adopters, and in general are more impatient as compared to Apple users (something that has changed in the recent time).
In-app purchases
If your app’s business model has in-app purchase at the center, it would be preferable to go with App Store instead of Android Play Store. While the average per user in-app purchase per app in the case of Apple is $1.08, in case of the same number gets reduced to $0.43.
Talking of in-app purchases, the difference can be seen on a geographical level as well.
On a global level per user app spending is $0.50, in Asia the number is $0.70 and in North America, Europe, and Latin America, the numbers are $0.61, $0.26, and $0.16 respectively.
Fragmentation
Talking of fragmentation in terms of the variety of devices your app would be able to reach, the one platform that emerges as an unprecedented winner is Android. Because Google has partnered with a number of device manufacturers, there are now thousands of devices under Android umbrella as opposed to Apple.
If you are looking for a platform that would help your startup become a household name by taking it to the masses minus any specific demographic challenge, Android app development will be your answer. But if making a presence among an elite concentrated group of users is what you are aiming for, go with your team of iOS developers.
Ease of design & development
The question on which is the most preferred choice for startups – Android vs iOS, has a solution that is different on both Android and iOS development front.
While in terms of designing, Google Material Design has a greater impact on user experience, mobile app developers feel that when it comes to coding mobile apps, Swift is a much easier language to get started with as compared to Java.
However, design and development is one factor that depends less on the platform and more on the skill of your partnered mobile android app development company. When you associate with a brand that specializes in the development of both Apple and Android apps, it doesn’t matter which platform requires less developmental efforts as both are done within equal efforts.
Release cycles
Talking of Android release cycle vs iOS Release cycle, the updation of apps in case of Android is generally restricted with the partnered OEM devices and the OS versions that they support- an issue that Apple and its concentrated list of iPhones and iPads never have to face.
What this means is that while with iOS you can focus on giving the support of new OS version in your present app with much ease, the level of fragmentation that Android comes with makes releasing new OS versions very difficult.
Now that we have seen the factors that would help decide which platform to go with for your first mobile app, the sad truth remains – There is no yes or no answer to which platform should startups go with between Android and iOS.
But while it will be difficult for us to get you an answer to ‘Android vs iOS: Which platform should Startups Choose’ let us get you the answer to the Why and When.
Difference Between iOS and Android Development
There is obviously a comparison between iOS and Android app development that is generally seen by developers during the process toward creating mobile applications. Let’s have a look at these differences
Programming language
The Android and iOS development operating systems are each customized in various programming languages. This is actually the greatest difference where iOS applications run on Objective-C/Swift, while Android applications run on Java.
The programming in iOS and android platforms utilize different technology stacks. The former vigorously depends on Java or Kotlin as an alternative, while the latter one has an exclusive language intended for application advancement – Swift.
Now you must be thinking which stack is quick and easy to dominate? Most of the app developers discover that an iOS application is simpler to make than the Android one. As the Swift coding involves less time than getting around Java since this language has high clarity and readability.
As Kotlin grows further, in future it is considered to be a prospective Java replacement due to its natural, current, and easy to read features.
Thus, programming languages utilized for iOS have a shorter learning curve than those for Android and are, hence, simple to dominate.
Testing
Every application’s QA testing phase is important for the mobile application development process. The same applies to games and different sorts of software. One should make sure that the application he is creating works perfectly. The iOS simulator and the Android emulator are examples that are frequently used to test this.
A definite difference is that the iOS simulator is a lot quicker than Android. In any case, the Android emulator has the near benefit of being a powerful virtual machine including CPU, which makes it more practical than its iOS equivalent. The iOS simulator often neglects to deliver precise and realistic portrayals of Apple devices.
Therefore, it is important to complete several tests on real smart devices to see the application’s interaction flow and detect potential bugs.
Interface
This is where we come over the visual contrasts when we develop an application for an Android or iOS user. At the technical level, the app developer will assemble XML documents onto Android interfaces. These are basically the same as iOS’ XIB documents.
The nature of iOS animations is superior to the one from Android. Google has attempted to fix this through the preview of Android L and by building up an application design pattern known as Material Design. Meanwhile, Apple has consistently been focusing on delicate, complex, and amazing animations by taking care of its user experience cautiously. Google, on the other hand, chose to fcus on the hardware rather than these perspectives.
Design
For Apple, the content of the application has importance over design. Therefore, clearness and the wide utilization of white space is advisable. The most widely recognized tools utilized by UI designers are shadows and gradients. All things considered, the application’s design ought to convey a feeling of depth and multi-layers.
Android designs come from real inspiration and motivation. Thus, colors and motion are two characterizing factors. Android designers work with a more extensive scope of tools such as light, motions, shading, color, etc.
When Should Startups Choose iOS?
You should place your startup’s first mobile app on iOS by investing in a sound reputed iOS app development company if you wish to come in the sight of the app store’s target demographics. Also, if you are not convinced of an app’s ability to be liked and moved to the home screen, the less fragmented world of Apple might come in handy as you won’t have to invest time in preparing your app for multiple devices.
The benefit of concentration and high revenue-generating capability together makes iPhone app development advantageous for businesses.
When And Why Startups Choose Android App Development?
You should go with Android first if your audience is not concentrated on any one specific location. Also, if there are a good number of customization elements in your mobile app, go with Android. The benefit of reach and customization that the platform offers, makes it almost necessary for Businesses to have an Android app.
When And Why Startups Choose IOS App Development?
You have to remember that in the debate between Android vs iPhone: Which Platform should Startups choose for First Mobile App have a third option as well, one which ends the confusion between iPhone or Android – Launch app on both Android and iOS.
While the option should be chosen as a solution by companies who have enough monetary and time resources, you should invest in mobile app development companies that specialize in Cross Platform app development to grab the opportunity to enjoy the best of all.
Now that we have seen it all – The factors that affect the Android vs iPhone choice for startups and the situations when one is deemed preferable than the other – it is now time to answer a very futuristic, logical question – When should a Business Move from one Platform to Another.
When Should Your Startup Extend from One Platform to Another?
The answer to this lies in – When your app has taken all the advantage of the current platform it is on. If your app has reached a position where it is now getting constant revenue from the App Store, expand it to the Play Store to get greater reach.
If your Android App has gained enough followers on the Play Store, increase the scope of monetization by taking it to the App Store.
Hopefully, our little pocket guide was able to help you get an answer to which platform your early-stage startup should choose. If we have left a scope of confusion, reach out to our team of mobile app strategist and our iOS and android app development company in USA to get the answer.
Both PHP and ASP.NET has broad bases. They are used by huge number of developers and this makes it difficult for the new developers to choose either one of them. In one hand, PHP is a general scripting language on which developers rely to a great extent and on the other hand, ASP.NET has a brand like Microsoft attached to its name.
ASP.NET vs PHP is an argument that doesn’t seem to have an end any time soon. Since both are quite popular languages in the programming world. You must have seen a ton of articles on differences between ASP.NET and PHP by now but in reality most of those articles are biased.
However, in this article we will talk about both the programming languages, breakdown the terms in for better understanding and discuss which is better ASP.NET or PHP.
PHP
PHP is a recursive acronym for Hypertext Preprocessor. It is an open source programming language that is used for web development and can be embedded into HTML. The best thing about PHP framework is that it is great for beginners since it allows simple and easy coding techniques. On the other hand PHP is great for professional programmers as well because of all the advanced features it offers. PHP framework is said to be adopted by many businesses in the near future and you can look at the upcoming best php frameworks here.
Pros and Cons of PHP framework
Pros:
One of the biggest advantage that PHP has is the rapid development. The market demands faster app development process and PHP gives the benefit to any mobile app development company that does multiple productions in one day. The framework is not only fast but ensures the security of the application. But the PHP developers have to make sure to use the framework as it is meant to be used to ensure application’s security. PHP is easier to maintain and has a huge community of developers that provides help whenever needed.
Cons:
PHP is prefered by developers for all the advantages it provides but they can’t ignore the disadvantages that comes with it. Slower execution, lack of ability to solve specific problems and time taking to master are some of the cons of this framework.
ASP.NET
ASP.NET is an open-source server side web development tool developed by Microsoft. The framework provides web development tools to produce dynamic web pages, web applications and web solutions. ASP.NET frameworks are written in .NET language and support Visual Basic.NET, JavaScript.NET and languages like Python and Perl. The framework also compatible with the previous version ASP.NET MVC.
Pros and Cons of ASP.NET frameworks
Pros
The pros of using ASP.NET include the flexibility to add and remove features as and when needed, the ease of setting up, an open-source and cross-platform framework and compatibility with other .NET frameworks. Microsoft has claimed it to be a highly popular framework soon just like Ruby and Node.js.
Cons
However, ASP.NET does have a few cons that may make its popularity a slow process. The framework does have problems when it comes to ease of making changes, documentation gaps, lack of supporting tools and lack of basic features since its too raw. These issues can be solved by ASP.NET developers, of course, by using external tools and methods.
ASP.NET vs PHP: The comparison
There is no doubt that both ASP.NET and PHP frameworks are great frameworks to work with but one may have few advantages more than the other. For professional developers this debate has already been settled based on their experience with each of the frameworks. But any budding developer might want to take a look at this comparison to decide which platform to start with.
Both PHP and ASP.NET provide multiple advantages and at the same time has some disadvantages. To decide which one is better than the other, we shall compare each of these two carefully. In this section we will discuss ASP.NET vs PHP: Which is better?
Performance
When it comes to the performance of a framework there is a misconception that the language of the framework determines its performance. However, this is not completely true. The performance of any framework depends on the way the coding was done.
The performance of ASP.NET is comparatively better than that of PHP. This statement may not be believed by PHP developers for the fact that many great websites have been built using PHP.
While that may be true but it does not dismiss the fact that ASP.NET allows parallel programming which lets chunks of code to run all at the same time whereas PHP does not support threading at all.
Market Share
The biggest difference between ASP.NET and PHP is the usage and market share. The chart below clearly shows that PHP has more usage popularity than ASP.NET. The websites built with PHP has been ranked among the Top 10k sites, Top 100k sites and Top 1M sites. Whereas ASP.NET hasn’t been awarded any titles that can beat PHP’s.
Security
Another huge difference between ASP.NET and PHP is the security options they both provide. Both the platforms provide security features to the developers however ASP.NET has built-in security features such as SQL injection. In other words, ASP.NET automatically does the work for you whereas PHP only provides you with the tools.
So to settle which is better ASP.NET or PHP security-wise, ASP.NET would be the right choice. The PHP developers are provided with the tool and if they wish they can structure their apps securely. Sadly, many PHP developers don’t care about it and that results in vulnerable apps.
Websites
Since it has been said earlier in the article that websites that used PHP has been ranked top as compared to ASP.NET built websites here are two lists to compare ASP.NET vs PHP websites:
Websites built using PHP
Facebook
Wikipedia
WordPress.com
Flickr
Yahoo!
iStockPhoto
Tumblr
Mailchimp
Websites built using ASP.NET
StackOverflow
Microsoft
GoDaddy
DELL
Visual Studio
Wild Tangent
Diply.com
TacoBell.com
Among these, some websites are extremely popular in both the lists but the majority of famous websites are PHP developed.
Cost-wise which is better, ASP.NET or PHP?
In this area, PHP is a clear winner for the reason that PHP is an open source development framework whereas ASP.NET charges some fee for hosting. The fee charged by Microsoft owned ASP.NET is not high but when compared to PHP’s free usage, it can make developers skeptical towards ASP.NET.
The cost does not however stop ASP.NET developers from building websites using the framework. Another great way is to outsource the ASP.NET mobile app development services.
Community Support: ASP.NET vs PHP
It’s a given that PHP has a larger community than ASP.NET because it’s free. But that is not the only thing to say about a good community. ASP.NET community consists of highly dedicated developers who are supportive of their community even though the numbers is not as high as PHP. Of course the PHP community regularly comes up with the solutions to the challenges faced during PHP web apps development process.
However, advantage of ASP.NET over PHP is that the ASP.NET developers have a community that is rather dedicated towards programming that having a large support.
Advantages of ASP.NET over PHP
All the comparisons in the previous section point towards choosing PHP over ASP.NET. But this may seem unfair to those who are looking for reasons to choose ASP.NET over PHP. So what is the use of ASP.NET?
ASP.NET provides the freedom to choose from multiple languages such as C#, Visual Basic.NET, C++, etc.
The SQL security feature that ASP.NET provides is automatically applied to the applications and has unlimited data storage.
With ASP.NET you get multiple .NET libraries which is not the case in PHP development.
ASP.NET allows threading of codes which allows multiple codes to run at the same time.
ASP.NET developers are paid much better than any PHP developer because of there are less ASP.NET developers in the market.
As this debate of ASP.NET vs PHP comes to an end its time to decide which one is better than the other. Both the development frameworks are exceptionally great in the work they do and developers freely choose between them as per the need of the development process.
In many cases PHP has proved to be a stronger framework but has also had some weaknesses that can affect the development process to a great extent. We have also seen a completely separate section for the advantages in ASP.NET development which consisted of strong points of benefits for the developers.
PHP has a huge community and is a free framework to work with. On the other hand ASP.NET is likely to have more scope in the future since it has a huge company name Microsoft behind it.
But if you still can’t decide between the two, contact our team at Anteelo and we will help you out. We engage in both ASP.NET web app development and PHP mobile app development services which will help us give you the best solution for your problems. Take a look at our mobile app development guide for more information.
Getting into agreements in a sans Blockchain world involves an active participation – which comes attached with a price tag – of intermediaries, something that in one way or the other limits the horizons a business can reach in terms of extending their business relations. Cut to the era of Blockchain. Blockchain, along with its sidekick Smart Contract enable businesses to develop a decentralized ecosystem that allows them to make agreements without the involvement of any third party intermediary – Ergo, New Horizons now comes into the picture for Businesses to penetrate in.
Although Smart Contract seems so have received its fair share of hype only after it came under the shadow of Blockchain Technology, the concept had already made its appearance twenty years ago when Nick Szabo, a cryptographer wrote an article about it.
So what are Smart Contracts exactly?
Smart Contract is a computer program that is stored inside a Blockchain. They are coded in a way to automatically control asset transfer between two (or more) parties, when the predefined conditions are met.
What is a Smart Contract Platform Supposed to Do?
A Smart Contract Platform is a platform which provides support for creation and execution of smart contracts. There are many names in the list of smart contract platforms in the market today – Ethereum, EOS, NEO, Hyperledger Fabric, Cardano, Stellar etc.
Out of all these platforms, today we will be focusing our attention on the oldest and most adopted – Ethereum and the new and hyped platform, which claims to be more efficient than Ethereum – EOS.
In this article, we will be comparing the two powerful platforms – EOS vs Ethereum – head on to fathom which platform has the potential to go farthest.
Both EOS and Ethereum are Turing complete Smart Contract Development Platforms that are leveraged by businesses for Smart Contract and Decentralized Applications Development. While Ethereum charges gas fees in form of Ethereum currency for allowing businesses to run their Apps or Smart Contract on their platform on per transaction basis, EOS charges some EOS cryptocurrency only at the initial stage and don’t charge any network development or transaction fees.
Ethereum
Ethereum is an open blockchain platform that allows developers to build and execute Smart Contract on Blockchain. To enable blockchain app developers to implement smart contracts on Ethereum, the platform has launched its own contract oriented programming language called Solidity.
The platform uses the proof-of-work consensus algo, which it plans on upgrading to the proof-of-stake consensus.
Ethereum, aside from being the leading smart contract and decentralized application development platform, also has its Ethereum cryptocurrency platform called Ether.
EOS
The brainchild of Daniel Larimer (the name behind Graphene Technology and the first developer to have implemented the POS consensus), EOS platform works on a similar model like Ethereum but comes with a number of differentiating factors.
EOS makes it possible to process greater number of transactions on a per second basis than Ethereum. The platform, feature wise, is a lot more scalable and includes elements like sharding, plasma, and the comes with the benefits of the proof of stake (dPoS and TaPoS) consensus.
Like Ethereum, EOS has its own EOS cryptocurrency platform as well, named after the platform itself – EOS Cryptocurrency
With this, you are now up to speed with what both the platforms are and now (finally) it’s time to get on to what we came here for – to answer the question on every Blockchain enthusiast’s mind ‘EOS vs Ethereum: Who Will Win the Title of Best Smart Contract Platform’
EOS vs Ethereum
1. Design Philosophy
Ethereum
Ethereum has been developed as a neutral platform. It doesn’t come packaged with features, which allows users to develop their own feature based sub-protocol within a contract. This prevents instances of bloating in an application.
EOS
EOS comes with functions like app/blockchain communication tools and cryptography implementations. It features a range of different options varying from web toolkit to help with interface development to the self-describing database schemes.
2. Governance
Ethereum
Ethereum is presently working on a Proof-of-Work consensus with the plans to move to a hybrid of Proof-of-Work/Proof-of-Stake. Ethereum makes it mandatory for developers to adhere to the code and solve major disagreements through forks.
EOS
EOS uses Graphene technology that makes use of the delegated Proof-of-Stake (dPoS and TaPoS) consensus. For resolution of disputes, EOS will come with la egally binding constitution which would establish a common jurisdiction.
3. Scalability
Ethereum
Ethereum network has till date achieved around 25 transactions per second and it can increase to upto 50 to 100 tps.
EOS
EOS has been able to achieve over 10,000 to 100,000 transaction per second in stress testing. The platform, which is based on Graphene technology, uses parallelization to enable scalability and for allowing million of transactions to run together per second.
4. Network Fees
Ethereum
Ethereum charges fees, in the valuation of Ether (the Ethereum Currency), in return of using storage, calculation, or bandwidth. The required fees in Ethereum fluctuates and the miners are given the option of selecting transactions that depend on the fee size.
EOS
EOS will make of ownership model, where the EOS token holders will get a proportionate share in storage, network bandwidth, and in processing power. They will have the provision to upgrade by buying more EOS.
EOS platform though, will charge zero network development and transaction fees. Users will only have to purchase the EOS token in the initial phase.
5. Denial of Service
Ethereum
In Ethereum, Miners select the high fees transactions for adding them to Blockchain and since there is a limited bandwidth and computing power, probability of low fee transactions getting blocked out are very high.
EOS
Ownership of EOS tokens gives the users a proportional stake in storage, network bandwidth, and the computing power. In EOS, even the startups that have a very little stake invested in the platform also get guaranteed, reliable computational power and bandwidth.
So here were the points of difference that define the underlying ecosystem of both EOS and Ethereum.
Seeing this, it is safe to assume that EOS, once fully functional and adopted, holds the potential to replace Ethereum in the near future, if the latter doesn’t introduce updates to make its platform more user centric instead of profit centric.
While that is about the future, if Ethereum wants to come points ahead of EOS sooner, it will have to make amendments in its architecture by introducing features akin to Operating system architecture of EOS. In fact, the DOS incident that happened back in 2016, could have been avoided completely if Ethereum was indeed an Operating System and not a state machine.
While saying EOS will replace Ethereum in the coming future is still a statement less of surety and more of probability, the differentiating factors that EOS comes packaged with, bring the platform very close to winning the race to becoming the best smart contract development platform.
EOS Features that Bring it Points Ahead of Ethereum
1. Zero Transaction Fees for End Users
While EOS users should own or rent some cryptocurrency to use the platform, they don’t have to pay anything to perform a transaction. A factor that works in favour of the B2C users, who no more have to pay to make transactions on their decentralized applications.
Also, since there is no entry fees, businesses that lack the technical know how can also confidently enter the world of Smart Contracts.
2. Scalability
The transaction per second number that EOS is aiming for is far more than what is offered by Ethereum. While in case of Ethereum it is 15 tps, EOS stands at 1000 – 6000 transactions per second.
EOS uses asynchronous communications and separate authentication from the execution itself to achieve speedups.
3. Governance based on Stake
EOS Cryptocurrency Holders have the right to vote on a change of protocol, with the vote count being proportional to the amount of cryptocurrency that they hold.
Are these differentiators enough to validate that Ethereum time is coming to an end? Is Ethereum passing the baton to EOS? Well…. Not in so many words.
It has now become a matter of time. If Ethereum is able to work on its obvious scalability issues and act on its image – that although it works great, it works on a limited scale – through updating its ecosystem while there’s time, it will survive the race.
For now, we will have to leave it on time to declare the clear winner of this smart contract race. Because the current state of both the platforms are that there are some decentralized applications that will need the speed and scalability that EOS offers and there are some that would need the privacy and censorship resistance that Ethereum offers.
On-site servers are the traditional way to run business applications. Today, however, they face stiff competition from the cloud, a platform that has revolutionised the way companies operate. While the ultimate decision about which is best depends on the needs of the individual company, here, we’ll examine the pros and cons of both, to give you a more informed understanding.
Costs
Though on-site servers are exceptional pieces of high-performance equipment and can be built to your own specification, they are very expensive to purchase. What’s more, as technology quickly advances, they can soon become obsolete. The use of more resource-heavy apps and the increasing amount of data being stored means businesses regularly need to upgrade to more powerful servers with bigger drives – a constant burden on budgets, especially when you need to keep redundant backup servers ready to take over in case of a hardware failure or other disaster. In addition, there are all the associated costs of running servers in-house: energy, premises, security, insurance, maintenance and management.
The cloud offers a completely different type of model: Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS). IaaS allows an organisation can dispense with its own datacentre and run its applications on the infrastructure of its service provider. There is no need to buy the hardware, maintain a datacentre or pay any of the associated costs. These are all taken care of by the vendor. Of course, the service isn’t free but the costs are paid monthly making it easier on cash flow.
Furthermore, it’s the cloud vendor who will cover the costs of hardware upgrades and ensure that the hardware is maintained. Unlike on-site servers, the virtualisation used in cloud computing means your applications will remain online for 100% of the time even in the event of hardware failure.
Software
Businesses with on-site servers have complete freedom over their choice of software and this enables them to keep using legacy applications which may not work in a cloud environment. That said, the majority of applications can be migrated to the cloud without issue and there are many cloud-native applications, including advanced tools like artificial intelligence and machine learning that work best in a cloud environment.
Another consideration is accessibility. With the cloud, a business will need internet connectivity to access applications. While this was a drawback many years ago, today, nearly all businesses and their machines have internet connections and users will be able to just log in and go, whether they are in the workplace or working remotely. Applications that run on an on-site server don’t need an internet connection for users to access them. However, users will need to be connected to the business network and this means they won’t be able to access the apps remotely.
Though not every business needs quick deployment, cloud-based applications can be deployed in minutes. With an on-site server, they may need to be installed on the server and, in some instances, on each users’ workstation. For companies that need to move quickly, the cloud can provide accelerated development.
The final thing to consider is software cost. Most applications used in the cloud are open-source and free. When it comes to proprietary software, those with on-site servers will have to pay the full cost of the software licence, while in the cloud, you’ll often find the vendor has purchased a licence that enables them to share the software with clients for a reduced cost and this will be spread over their monthly payments.
Security
While some companies might worry over the security of the cloud, it’s worth remembering that cloud providers have to comply with stringent regulations to keep their infrastructures secure.
The chief security benefit of an on-site server is that its single tenancy offers potentially greater compliance for the storage of sensitive data. Of course, that all depends upon how secure the on-site server is. Implementing advanced security measures comes at a cost that is too high for many businesses. With cloud vendors investing heavily in security expertise and the latest tools, like next-gen firewalls and intrusion and malware prevention, they often provide more robust security than can be implemented in-house.
Scalability
As mentioned earlier, businesses are using more resource-hungry applications and collect more data. Scaling up horizontally in a datacentre can be very expensive, whereas scaling vertically by upgrading your server will mean taking it offline and paying for the new components. Neither of these is ideal, especially when peaks in demand require additional resources to be instantly available.
In the cloud, scaling up just means using more of your vendor’s vast datacentre resources and this can be done at the click of a button. What’s even better is that scaling up and down can be done on demand and is charged for on a pay as you go basis, so there is no long term charge for additional resources which aren’t used. This is far more cost-effective than paying for additional on-site hardware that largely remains redundant.
Conclusion
Cloud and on-site servers are both powerful solutions. On-site dedicated servers are best suited for high-performance applications and single tenancy storage compliance whereas the cloud is ideal for high availability, scalability and swift deployment. Additionally, the cloud is less expensive, offers access to digital transformation technologies and provides internet connectivity for users to access the system remotely.
future to developers. Both languages are highly in demand in the marketplace, something that can be understood from the number of monthly jobs advertised related to them.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Buildingdesigns-GettyImages-912482942-db55b3af711044a3a42ad1040c6711a9.jpg)
/eos-5bfc323e46e0fb002602aed7.jpg)
